Arthur and George

Last night I saw Arthur and George at Birmingham Rep. Based on the novel by Julian Barnes and adapted for theatre by David Edgar, the play was noted as one of the theatrical events of the year by both The Times and The Guardian in their arts round-up for 2010. The plot follows Arthur Conan Doyle, the creator of Sherlock Holmes, as he attempts to absolve an Anglo-Indian solicitor, George Edalji, of a series of crimes, in 1903. Of course, it’s difficult not to see Conan Doyle as a prototype for his fictional detective, but throughout the play it’s evident that he’s sick to death of his own creation, which is a hint not to see the play itself in terms of a detective drama.

Instead, it’s nuanced, and leans towards other ways of seeing: for example, while Doyle, and his sidekick Woods, begin to conduct the case as if they were Holmes and Watson, it becomes clear that Holmes’s methods are only for fictional cases and don’t work for real-life situations. George is unhappy with the high-handed way Doyle treats his situation, attempting to fight injustice, to “right a terrible wrong” and expose the class and race prejudice of the police force who prosecuted Edalji; George, however, just wants his job back. Though the plot is absorbing and moves forward well, the themes and sub-texts of the book are developed too; eventually, the plot becomes almost secondary to these, and if one were to be seduced by the idea that Conan Doyle equals Sherlock Holmes, the outcome might be disappointing, but by the end, other issues rather than “solving a mystery” have taken precedence. IN many ways, it’s all about life versus fiction, and life wins.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Arthur and George

  1. Thanks for your comment and the link to your review of the book. I’m afraid to say I haven’t read the novel – I was hoping to before I saw the play but PhD got in the way! I will definitely be reading it soon though – your review has made me even more enthusiastic about it! I’m prepared to bet the book is better – just because it can fit more in – but most of the themes you mention are covered in the play, even if only tangentially.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s