
In her slightly crazed Angelica, she’s convincing and at times almost mesmerising (I’m still bemused by Satan in a tree, though). To a certain extent she is the usual cipher for the usual emphasis on how repressed women have always been (yawn). Charles I (Peter Capaldi) is also good – arrogant, filled with the divine right of kings, he’s a less stereotypical Charles than one might expect. My main argument with the series so far is that history seems to have become a backdrop to one woman’s possible sexual intrigues. Many of the characters are genuine historical figures, from the obvious (Cromwell, Charles I) to John Lilburne, or “Freeborn John”, and Rainsborough. But if you didn’t happen to study this period of history for A-level, as I did, it can be difficult to disentangle fact from fiction (and even I have been checking my facts in Robert Ashton’s Reformation and Revolution, which I thoroughly recommend if you’re confused too!)
Since this revolutionary – in all senses of the word – period in history is often overlooked, I think the drama of The Devil’s Whore may be just the thing to pique people’s interest. I certainly hope so, and I hope we get to see more revolutionary politics rather than more corsets in the next episode. This certainly makes a dramatic change from the usual “period dramas”.
I quite enjoyed it even though it wasn’t 100% historically accurate. Hopefully it also had some educational value for those that aren’t aware of that part of history.